CAE · COMPOSITE OPTIMISATION

COMPOSITE LAYUP OPTIMISATION

Simulation-led optimisation and experimental validation of a CFRP motorsport suspension pull rod, investigating laminate thickness and ply orientation under tensile and torsional loading.

2.5 kN AXIAL LOAD
2.7 Nm TORSIONAL LOAD
3 PLIES TENSILE OPTIMUM
≈ 36 kN PEAK TEST LOAD

GENESIS GRM · MATLAB · ASTM TESTING · CFRP

Manufactured composite suspension pull rods
Manufactured CFRP suspension pull rods

01

ENGINEERING LOAD CASE

The front suspension pull rod was assessed under a severe braking condition. Vehicle load transfer was used to determine the axial force transmitted through the pull rod, while an eccentric load case provided a representative torsional moment.

PULL-ROD FORCE
F p = ((F + Δ) μ) / cos(θ)
Calculated axial load ≈ 2.5 kN
TORSIONAL MOMENT
T = F p × e
Calculated torsional moment ≈ 2.7 Nm
Static and braking free body diagrams for the suspension load case
Static and braking load cases used to define the pull-rod loading

02

MATERIAL CHARACTERISATION

VTC401 CFRP was experimentally characterised before simulation so that the material model was based on measured rather than purely supplier-derived properties. Tensile and compression testing was performed at 0° and 90° orientations.

ASTM tensile and compression test setups for VTC401 CFRP
ASTM D3039 tensile and ASTM D6641 compression testing

INPUT

GENESIS MATERIAL CARD

Experimental results were consolidated into a MAT8 material card for the anisotropic composite model used in Genesis GRM.

Property Value
E 1 55.3 GPa
E 2 55.4 GPa
G 12 26.5 GPa
ν 12 0.05
Density 1.80 g/cm³
Ply thickness 0.285 mm

The measured card also included longitudinal, transverse and shear strength values for optimisation and structural assessment.

03

CAE METHODOLOGY

01 LOAD CASE MATLAB calculations
→
02 MATERIAL CARD Experimental inputs
→
03 MESH 1 mm nominal size
→
04 TENSION Thickness optimisation
→
05 TORSION RBE2 load application
→
06 OPTIMISE Mass + ply orientation
Pull rod mesh used for tensile simulation
Tensile model — 1 mm mesh
Pull rod torsion mesh using RBE2 spider
Torsional model — RBE2 spider for central moment application

The optimisation objective was minimum mass. Tensile analysis varied laminate thickness between 3 and 10 plies, while torsional optimisation explored ply orientation between −90° and +90° in 5° increments.

04A

TENSILE OPTIMISATION

Genesis GRM was used to minimise laminate thickness while retaining the required response under the calculated tensile load. The optimisation converged on a three-ply laminate for the tensile case.

Genesis GRM tensile optimisation results
Tensile normal stress and strain distributions
3 PLIES Optimised tensile laminate thickness

04B

TORSIONAL OPTIMISATION

The torsional load case changed the optimum fibre strategy. Off-axis plies were required to carry shear more effectively, producing a layup dominated by ±45° orientations around a central 0° ply.

Genesis GRM torsional ply optimisation results
Ply-orientation optimisation under torsional loading
[45° / 0° / 45°] Optimised torsional ply orientation

05

MANUFACTURING & TOOLING

A CNC-machined aluminium split mould was developed to manufacture the hollow aerofoil pull rods. The mould incorporated controlled alignment and jacking features, while an internal vacuum-bagging method was developed to consolidate the laminate through the component's closed section.

CNC-machined aluminium tooling Split-mould construction Internal vacuum bagging 0° and 45° manufactured pull rods
VIEW CNC MACHINING SIMULATION →
VIEW COMPOSITE MANUFACTURING VIDEO →
Split aluminium mould for composite pull rod manufacture
Orientation-specific split aluminium mould
Manufactured 0 degree and 45 degree composite pull rods
Manufactured 0° and 45° CFRP pull rods

06A

PHYSICAL VALIDATION

Manufactured pull rods were physically tested in tension to assess whether the laminate behaviour observed experimentally followed the expected influence of fibre orientation.

Force versus extension comparison for 0 and 45 degree pull rods
Force–extension response of 0° and 45° pull rods
Layup Peak load Observed response
0° ≈ 36 kN Higher stiffness · brittle fibre-dominated failure
45° ≈ 17 kN Lower tensile capacity · progressive shear response

06B

FAILURE BEHAVIOUR

The test results showed a clear difference in failure mechanism. The 0° specimen failed abruptly through the fibre-dominated load path, whereas the 45° specimen exhibited greater delamination and matrix cracking associated with off-axis loading.

Failure modes of 0 and 45 degree composite pull rods
Failure comparison — 0° brittle fracture vs 45° delamination

The physical testing supports the expected directional behaviour of the laminates, while the limited sample count means the results should be interpreted as validation of the engineering trend rather than a statistically complete correlation study.

07

KEY TAKEAWAYS

01
TEST-DRIVEN MATERIAL MODEL

Experimental characterisation provided the material inputs used to build the anisotropic Genesis GRM model.

02
LOAD-SPECIFIC LAYUP DESIGN

A 0°-dominant laminate suited tensile loading, while ±45° fibres became important when torsional shear was introduced.

03
CAE TO PHYSICAL VALIDATION

The project linked analytical loading, experimental inputs, simulation, manufacturing and physical component testing.

“This project demonstrated that composite optimisation cannot be separated from material characterisation and manufacturing. The confidence placed in the CAE model depended directly on the quality of the experimental inputs and the ability to reproduce the intended laminate physically.”